<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Gospel of Super Jesus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:16:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Victim In Fatal Car Crash Tragically Not Glenn Beck by Sabio Lantz</title>
		<link>http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/victim-in-fatal-car-crash-tragically-not-glenn-beck-2/#comment-2092</link>
		<dc:creator>Sabio Lantz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com/?p=1262#comment-2092</guid>
		<description>I hate when bad things make me laugh.  I am such a sinner.  And one beyond redemption at that !   Ahhhhhh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate when bad things make me laugh.  I am such a sinner.  And one beyond redemption at that !   Ahhhhhh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Too Big To Fail Redux (or) There Really IS A Regulation Fairy!!! by Sabio Lantz</title>
		<link>http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/too-big-to-fail-redux-or-there-really-is-a-regulation-fairy/#comment-2088</link>
		<dc:creator>Sabio Lantz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com/?p=1249#comment-2088</guid>
		<description>Well, I don&#039;t like the regs supported by republicans either.  They are corporate welfarists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t like the regs supported by republicans either.  They are corporate welfarists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Too Big To Fail Redux (or) There Really IS A Regulation Fairy!!! by SuperJesus</title>
		<link>http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/too-big-to-fail-redux-or-there-really-is-a-regulation-fairy/#comment-2087</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperJesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com/?p=1249#comment-2087</guid>
		<description>Yeah, because the global financial crisis raining down on everyone from unregulated &quot;capitalism&quot; now is so good for us.  

I&#039;m all for real capitalism where true risk/reward dynamics are at play, but these companies are not operating in a capitalistic way since they get all the benefit for taking massive risks but all of the downside falls on the public&#039;s shoulders.  

Regulation is rarely perfect but it&#039;s better than this flavor of Republican pixie dust bullshit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, because the global financial crisis raining down on everyone from unregulated &#8220;capitalism&#8221; now is so good for us.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for real capitalism where true risk/reward dynamics are at play, but these companies are not operating in a capitalistic way since they get all the benefit for taking massive risks but all of the downside falls on the public&#8217;s shoulders.  </p>
<p>Regulation is rarely perfect but it&#8217;s better than this flavor of Republican pixie dust bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Too Big To Fail Redux (or) There Really IS A Regulation Fairy!!! by Sabio Lantz</title>
		<link>http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/too-big-to-fail-redux-or-there-really-is-a-regulation-fairy/#comment-2086</link>
		<dc:creator>Sabio Lantz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com/?p=1249#comment-2086</guid>
		<description>Pixie dust ain&#039;t benign, you can choke to death on that stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pixie dust ain&#8217;t benign, you can choke to death on that stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Companies &#8220;Too Big To Fail&#8221; Should Be Illegal by Too Big To Fail Redux (or) There Really IS A Regulation Fairy!!! &#171; The Gospel of Super Jesus</title>
		<link>http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com/2008/11/25/companies-too-big-to-fail-should-be-illegal/#comment-2085</link>
		<dc:creator>Too Big To Fail Redux (or) There Really IS A Regulation Fairy!!! &#171; The Gospel of Super Jesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com/?p=538#comment-2085</guid>
		<description>[...] my memory serves me I seem to recall writing a little ramble nearly a year ago that suggested that it should be illegal for any company to become &#8221; too big to fail&#8221;.  I might have even suggested if a company deemed “too big to fail” requires government rescue [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my memory serves me I seem to recall writing a little ramble nearly a year ago that suggested that it should be illegal for any company to become &#8221; too big to fail&#8221;.  I might have even suggested if a company deemed “too big to fail” requires government rescue [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Companies &#8220;Too Big To Fail&#8221; Should Be Illegal by euandus</title>
		<link>http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com/2008/11/25/companies-too-big-to-fail-should-be-illegal/#comment-2084</link>
		<dc:creator>euandus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com/?p=538#comment-2084</guid>
		<description>How about relying not only on regulations, but also considering Paul Volcker&#039;s advice from experience: being too big is itself a problem that can and should be remedied?  I&#039;ve just posted on it at http://euandus3.wordpress.com/2009/10/25/bigger-banks-too-big-to-fail/

You might want to read the article I read: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33477077/ns/business-the_new_york_times/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about relying not only on regulations, but also considering Paul Volcker&#8217;s advice from experience: being too big is itself a problem that can and should be remedied?  I&#8217;ve just posted on it at <a href="http://euandus3.wordpress.com/2009/10/25/bigger-banks-too-big-to-fail/" rel="nofollow">http://euandus3.wordpress.com/2009/10/25/bigger-banks-too-big-to-fail/</a></p>
<p>You might want to read the article I read: <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33477077/ns/business-the_new_york_times/" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33477077/ns/business-the_new_york_times/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ever Hear How Humans Are The Only Animals To Use Tools? by Sabio Lantz</title>
		<link>http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/ever-hear-how-humans-are-the-only-animals-to-use-tools/#comment-2083</link>
		<dc:creator>Sabio Lantz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com/?p=1247#comment-2083</guid>
		<description>Wow, thanx.  I did a little post about &lt;a href=&quot;http://triangulations.wordpress.com/2009/06/12/what-makes-humans-unique/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;what makes humans unique&lt;/a&gt; too !
Yours was actually educational, thanx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, thanx.  I did a little post about <a href="http://triangulations.wordpress.com/2009/06/12/what-makes-humans-unique/" rel="nofollow">what makes humans unique</a> too !<br />
Yours was actually educational, thanx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on This Is &#8220;God&#8217;s Law&#8221;? by me</title>
		<link>http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/this-is-gods-law/#comment-2082</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 06:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com/?p=763#comment-2082</guid>
		<description>listen too all of those following degenerate religion where nothing comes out of it, all christian roots are nothing more than a laughable subject. If any is these is the correct one, Catholicism is you fucking baptist, evangelist, Mormons, or Jehovah&#039;s. forget jesus christ when you can have a cat with a stick in his hand who has died and come back to life, thanks to cloning technology, as your messiah. -</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>listen too all of those following degenerate religion where nothing comes out of it, all christian roots are nothing more than a laughable subject. If any is these is the correct one, Catholicism is you fucking baptist, evangelist, Mormons, or Jehovah&#8217;s. forget jesus christ when you can have a cat with a stick in his hand who has died and come back to life, thanks to cloning technology, as your messiah. -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Would Republican Jesus Do? by SuperJesus</title>
		<link>http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/what-would-republican-jesus-do/#comment-2081</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperJesus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com/?p=1236#comment-2081</guid>
		<description>Deuteronomy 28 says none of the things you mention...but Deuteronomy 22 might.  I&#039;ll put the KJV quotes below for your ease of reference, but let&#039;s paraphrase a little to make it readable. 

verses 20-21: If your wife isn&#039;t a virgin when you marry her, stone her to death.

verse 22: if a married woman has sex with another man, kill them both

verses 23-24: if a betrothed virgin has sex with another man in a city, kill them both because she obviously didn&#039;t yell loudly enough to protest the assault.

verses 25-27: if betrothed damsel has sex with another man in the field then only kill the man (because we can&#039;t prove she screamed, right?)

verses 28-29: however, if a man has sex with (or conceivably rapes) an unclaimed virgin he need only give her father fifty shekels and marry her...which is a good deal for her because her alternative is found in verses 20-21.
 

Selectively read your Bible much?


---
(King James Version) Deuteronomy 22:

20 But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel:

21 Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father&#039;s house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father&#039;s house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you.

22 If a man be found lying with a woman married to an husband, then they shall both of them die, both the man that lay with the woman, and the woman: so shalt thou put away evil from Israel.

23 If a damsel that is a virgin be betrothed unto an husband, and a man find her in the city, and lie with her;

24 Then ye shall bring them both out unto the gate of that city, and ye shall stone them with stones that they die; the damsel, because she cried not, being in the city; and the man, because he hath humbled his neighbour&#039;s wife: so thou shalt put away evil from among you.

25 But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field, and the man force her, and lie with her: then the man only that lay with her shall die.

26 But unto the damsel thou shalt do nothing; there is in the damsel no sin worthy of death: for as when a man riseth against his neighbour, and slayeth him, even so is this matter:

27 For he found her in the field, and the betrothed damsel cried, and there was none to save her.

28 If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found;

29 Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel&#039;s father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deuteronomy 28 says none of the things you mention&#8230;but Deuteronomy 22 might.  I&#8217;ll put the KJV quotes below for your ease of reference, but let&#8217;s paraphrase a little to make it readable. </p>
<p>verses 20-21: If your wife isn&#8217;t a virgin when you marry her, stone her to death.</p>
<p>verse 22: if a married woman has sex with another man, kill them both</p>
<p>verses 23-24: if a betrothed virgin has sex with another man in a city, kill them both because she obviously didn&#8217;t yell loudly enough to protest the assault.</p>
<p>verses 25-27: if betrothed damsel has sex with another man in the field then only kill the man (because we can&#8217;t prove she screamed, right?)</p>
<p>verses 28-29: however, if a man has sex with (or conceivably rapes) an unclaimed virgin he need only give her father fifty shekels and marry her&#8230;which is a good deal for her because her alternative is found in verses 20-21.</p>
<p>Selectively read your Bible much?</p>
<p>&#8212;<br />
(King James Version) Deuteronomy 22:</p>
<p>20 But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel:</p>
<p>21 Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father&#8217;s house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father&#8217;s house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you.</p>
<p>22 If a man be found lying with a woman married to an husband, then they shall both of them die, both the man that lay with the woman, and the woman: so shalt thou put away evil from Israel.</p>
<p>23 If a damsel that is a virgin be betrothed unto an husband, and a man find her in the city, and lie with her;</p>
<p>24 Then ye shall bring them both out unto the gate of that city, and ye shall stone them with stones that they die; the damsel, because she cried not, being in the city; and the man, because he hath humbled his neighbour&#8217;s wife: so thou shalt put away evil from among you.</p>
<p>25 But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field, and the man force her, and lie with her: then the man only that lay with her shall die.</p>
<p>26 But unto the damsel thou shalt do nothing; there is in the damsel no sin worthy of death: for as when a man riseth against his neighbour, and slayeth him, even so is this matter:</p>
<p>27 For he found her in the field, and the betrothed damsel cried, and there was none to save her.</p>
<p>28 If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found;</p>
<p>29 Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel&#8217;s father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Would Republican Jesus Do? by cori</title>
		<link>http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/what-would-republican-jesus-do/#comment-2080</link>
		<dc:creator>cori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesuperjesus.wordpress.com/?p=1236#comment-2080</guid>
		<description>While I can agree with the overall sentiment of the post, the image of Deuteronomy 28 is completely false. Deuteronomy 28:25-27 speaks of rape and likens it to murder. Therefore the punishment is to kill the rapist, but do no harm to the woman because she has committed no sin.

Verses 28-29 speak of a &quot;single lady&quot; having sex with another &quot;single guy.&quot; If they are caught, they are to be married. It is not adultery because neither of them are engaged or married. The simple solution to their impurity is to have them marry one another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I can agree with the overall sentiment of the post, the image of Deuteronomy 28 is completely false. Deuteronomy 28:25-27 speaks of rape and likens it to murder. Therefore the punishment is to kill the rapist, but do no harm to the woman because she has committed no sin.</p>
<p>Verses 28-29 speak of a &#8220;single lady&#8221; having sex with another &#8220;single guy.&#8221; If they are caught, they are to be married. It is not adultery because neither of them are engaged or married. The simple solution to their impurity is to have them marry one another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
